--- title: "IndiaCos vs MikeLegal: API and pricing compared (2026)" url: https://jurisgrid.com/compare/indiacos-vs-mikelegal/ reviewed: 2026-11-11 type: comparison sector: ip-tech --- # IndiaCos vs MikeLegal: which trademark search API is better in India? Reviewed: 11 Nov 2026 · Sector: IP Tech ## Short answer IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. MikeLegal shows none of these in this review. Pick MikeLegal for all-class search, image-based watch and opposition reports delivered in a dashboard. - Pick IndiaCos for trade mark, patent, design and copyright records by API and MCP, joined to companies and court cases, at a flat per-call price. - Pick MikeLegal for all-class trademark search, image-based watch and opposition reports in a team dashboard. ## Key facts - **IndiaCos:** IndiaCos is a company and GST data provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing ₹0.40 per successful call, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 85 of 100 (Nov 2026). - **MikeLegal:** MikeLegal is a contract management provider: no public API found, no public MCP server found, pricing not published, sign-up through sales, JurisGrid score 31 of 100 (Nov 2026). ## How do IndiaCos and MikeLegal score? IndiaCos scores 85, MikeLegal scores 31 out of 100. The gap is 54 points. | Criterion | Weight | IndiaCos | MikeLegal | |---|---|---|---| | Data coverage and depth | 20 | 4 of 4 | 2 of 4 | | Freshness and update cadence | 12 | 2 of 4 | 3 of 4 | | API availability | 15 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 | | MCP and agent readiness | 13 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 | | Pricing transparency | 12 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 4 | | Self-serve sign-up and free trial | 10 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 4 | | Documentation and developer experience | 8 | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 | | Track record and trust | 5 | 0 of 4 | 2 of 4 | | Product depth beyond data | 5 | 2 of 4 | 3 of 4 | | Total score | 100 | 85 | 31 | ## Which features does each one have? | Feature | IndiaCos | MikeLegal | |---|---|---| | Trademarks | Yes | Not published | | REST API | Yes | Not published | | MCP server | Yes | Not published | | Bulk export | Partial | Not published | | OpenAPI specification | Yes | Not published | | OAuth sign-in | Yes | Not published | | Free credit or free tier | Yes | Not published | | Pay per call pricing | Yes | Not published | | Self-serve sign-up | Yes | Not published | | Public pricing | Yes | Not published | ## How much do IndiaCos and MikeLegal cost? | Pricing | IndiaCos | MikeLegal | |---|---|---| | Pricing model | Pay per call | Not published | | Public price | INR 0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of INR 500, INR 5,000 and INR 50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription. | Not published | | Free tier | INR 50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published | | Minimum commitment | None: prepaid wallet, no subscription | Not published | | Source | https://indiacos.com/api | https://mikelegal.com/TMSearch | ## Do IndiaCos and MikeLegal have an API and an MCP server? | Access | IndiaCos | MikeLegal | |---|---|---| | REST API | Public REST API: https://indiacos.com/api/v1 | Not published | | MCP server | Public MCP server: https://indiacos.com/mcp | Not published | | Authentication | Bearer API key or X-API-Key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP server | Not published | | Docs | https://indiacos.com/api/docs | Not published | | Sign-up | Self-serve | Through sales | | Free tier | INR 50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published | | Rate limits | Not published | Not published | ```bash # Company master data by CIN curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/company/{CIN}" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY" # GST registration by GSTIN curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/gst/{GSTIN}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY" ``` ## What data does each one cover? **IndiaCos** - Companies and LLPs: 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPs (as of Nov 2026) - GST registrations: 67,05,270 registrations; full details for GSTINs registered 2025-01-01 to 2026-05-31 (as of Nov 2026) - Intellectual property: 34,76,034 trade marks, 10,90,748 patent applications, 2,05,377 designs and 2,78,307 copyrights (as of Nov 2026) - MSMEs and defaulters: 4,66,88,220 MSME records (loading continues state by state) and 7,21,017 defaulter entries (as of Nov 2026) - Data dates: Directors, charges and GST filings refreshed 23 Oct 2026; MCA monthly lists to 2026-08-31; company master date differs per company (as of Nov 2026) **MikeLegal** - Trademarks: Search "synced to IPO" across all 45 classes with phonetic and character permutations; weekly journal analysis in the watch product (as of Nov 2026) ## Which one should you choose? ### Choose IndiaCos if - you want trade mark search (34,76,034 marks from the Journal, 2014 onwards) by API with filters for class, office and journal issue, and Registry status where checked - you want a mark joined to its proprietor company by CIN and to court cases through GET /trademark/{application_number}/cases - you want trade marks, patents (10,90,748), designs (2,05,377) and copyrights (2,78,307) on one key - you want AI agents to call IP records through a public MCP server with OAuth and an agent sign-up flow - you want a flat INR 0.40 per successful call, errors and not-found calls free, and INR 50 free credit before you pay Skip it if you need phonetic or logo image similarity search, watch alerts, opposition data or filing: the OpenAPI spec reviewed describes word, proprietor, class, office and journal filters only. Data use is limited to internal business use and showing records to your own users; resale and AI training need a written licence. ### Choose MikeLegal if - you want MikeTM Search across all 45 classes in one click, with phonetic and character permutations and no 500-mark limit - you want MikeTM Watch to analyse the weekly journal with image recognition and send PDF or Excel opposition reports to clients - you also want contract review and drafting tools from the same vendor Skip it if you need a documented API, an MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: none was found for MikeLegal in this review; access starts with a demo. ## Frequently asked questions ### Which is better for trademark search, IndiaCos and MikeLegal? IndiaCos is the stronger choice for developers and AI agents that need trade mark data by API. MikeLegal is the better fit for IP teams that want all-class search, image-based watch and opposition reports in a dashboard. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them. ### Does MikeLegal have an API or an MCP server? No API is described on the MikeTM Search or MikeTM Watch pages in this review, and no public MCP server was found for MikeLegal. IndiaCos offers a REST API at indiacos.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI spec and an MCP server at indiacos.com/mcp with OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both. ### How much does MikeLegal cost compared with IndiaCos? MikeLegal does not list prices; its pages say "Get Pricing For Your Team". IndiaCos charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change. ### Can an AI agent use IndiaCos and MikeLegal? Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaCos: it runs a public MCP server with 25 tools covering companies, GST, directors, court cases and IP records. MikeLegal shows no public MCP server or API in this review, so there is no documented interface for an agent to call. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages. ### When should you choose MikeLegal instead of IndiaCos? Choose MikeLegal when you want MikeTM Search across all 45 classes, MikeTM Watch with image recognition and PDF or Excel opposition reports for clients, or contract tools from the same vendor. Choose IndiaCos less readily when you need phonetic or image similarity search or watch alerts, which its OpenAPI spec does not describe. ### What data does IndiaCos cover compared with MikeLegal? IndiaCos covers 34,76,034 trade marks (Journal, 2014 onwards), 10,90,748 patent applications (Journal, 2005 onwards), 2,05,377 registered designs (2009 onwards) and 2,78,307 copyrights, with trade marks and patents linked to company CINs. MikeLegal says its search is synced to the IPO across all 45 classes and does not publish record counts on the pages reviewed. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. ## Related - [IndiaCos profile](https://jurisgrid.com/providers/indiacos/index.md) - [MikeLegal profile](https://jurisgrid.com/providers/mikelegal/index.md) - [Best copyright registration search tools for India](https://jurisgrid.com/best/copyright-registration-search-india/index.md) - [IndiaCos vs IP India Public Search](https://jurisgrid.com/compare/indiacos-vs-ip-india-public-search/index.md) - [IndiaCos vs IPGO](https://jurisgrid.com/compare/indiacos-vs-ipgo/index.md) - [IndiaCos vs ipwatch](https://jurisgrid.com/compare/indiacos-vs-ipwatch/index.md) - [Methodology](https://jurisgrid.com/methodology/index.md)