AuthBridge vs Signzy vs IndiaCos
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Comparison, Company data
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Corpository shows no public API, MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up in this review. Pick Corpository for corporate information from a firm founded in 2015.
Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 10 Nov 2026 · How we score
IndiaCos scores 85, Corpository scores 10 out of 100. The gap is 75 points.
| Criterion | Weight | IndiaCos | Corpository |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data coverage and depth | 20 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Freshness and update cadence | 12 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| API availability | 15 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| MCP and agent readiness | 13 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Pricing transparency | 12 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Self-serve sign-up and free trial | 10 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Documentation and developer experience | 8 | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Track record and trust | 5 | 0 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| Product depth beyond data | 5 | 2 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Total score | 100 | 85 | 10 |
The matrix lists company data features relevant to company and gst data, as published by each provider.
| Feature matrix | IndiaCos | Corpository |
|---|---|---|
| Data | ||
| Court record check | Partial | Not published |
| Company master data | Yes | Yes |
| GST lookup | Yes | Not published |
| Director data | Yes | Not published |
| Trademarks | Yes | Not published |
| Charges and defaulter lists | Yes | Not published |
| Access | ||
| REST API | Yes | Not published |
| MCP server | Yes | Not published |
| Bulk export | Partial | Not published |
| Developer | ||
| OpenAPI specification | Yes | Not published |
| OAuth sign-in | Yes | Not published |
| Commercial | ||
| Free credit or free tier | Yes | Not published |
| Pay per call pricing | Yes | Not published |
| Self-serve sign-up | Yes | Not published |
| Public pricing | Yes | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.
IndiaCos: ₹0.40 per successful call. Corpository: prices not published.
| Pricing | IndiaCos | Corpository |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per call | Not published |
| Public price | ₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription. | Not published |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Minimum commitment | None: prepaid wallet, no subscription | Not published |
| Source | Pricing page | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos: public REST API, public MCP server. Corpository: no public API found, no public MCP server found.
| Access | IndiaCos | Corpository |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | Public REST APIhttps://indiacos.com/api/v1 | Not published |
| MCP server | Public MCP serverhttps://indiacos.com/mcp | Not published |
| Authentication | Bearer API key or X-API-Key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP server | Not published |
| Docs | API docs | Not published |
| Sign-up | Self-serve | Not published |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Rate limits | Not published | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
# Company master data by CIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/company/{CIN}" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"
# GST registration by GSTIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/gst/{GSTIN}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"IndiaCos lists 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPs (companies and llps), as of Nov 2026. Corpository does not publish a coverage summary on the pages JurisGrid reviewed.
| Coverage | IndiaCos | Corpository |
|---|---|---|
| Sources and records |
|
|
| Update cadence | Directors, charges and GST filings refreshed 23 Oct 2026; MCA monthly lists to 2026-08-31; company master date differs per company | Not published |
| As of | Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Skip it if you need audited financial statements or a fixed annual fee with a contract: IndiaCos is a prepaid per-call service built from public records, and its company master date differs by company.
Skip it if you need a public API, a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for Corpository in this review.
IndiaCos is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need company data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Corpository is the better fit for corporate information from a firm founded in 2015. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.
Corpository has no API documentation in this review. No public MCP server was found for Corpository. IndiaCos offers a REST API at indiacos.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI 3.1 spec and an MCP server at indiacos.com/mcp with OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.
Corpository does not publish a full price list in this review. IndiaCos charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.
Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaCos: it runs a public MCP server with 25 tools covering companies, GST, directors, court cases and IP records. Corpository shows no public MCP server in this review, so there is no documented API for an agent to call. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.
Choose Corpository when you want corporate information from a firm founded in 2015, in which CredAvenue took a majority stake in 2022. It is also a good fit when you weigh operating history, and JurisGrid found public signals of it for Corpository. Choose IndiaCos less readily when you need audited financial statements or a fixed annual fee with a contract: IndiaCos is a prepaid per-call service built from public records, and its company master date differs by company.
IndiaCos covers 32,85,193 companies, 5,95,467 LLPs and 67,05,270 GST registrations, with directors, charges, court case summaries and 34,76,034 trade marks. Corpository does not publish coverage figures on the pages reviewed. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.
Other company and gst data comparisons on JurisGrid.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for IndiaCos, Corpository.