Comparison, IP tech

IndiaCos vs PatSeer: which patent search API is better in India?

Reviewed by JurisGrid

IndiaCos
JurisGrid score 85 out of 100
vs
PatSeer
JurisGrid score 26 out of 100

Short answer

IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents needing Indian patent records: public API, MCP server, per-call prices, self-serve sign-up. PatSeer shows none of these in this review. Pick PatSeer for worldwide patent analytics and novelty, invalidity or freedom to operate workflows.

  • Pick IndiaCos for Indian patent, trade mark, design and copyright records by API and MCP, joined to company CINs, at a flat per-call price.
  • Pick PatSeer for worldwide patent search and analytics, with novelty, invalidity and freedom to operate workflows.

Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 11 Nov 2026 · How we score

Key facts

IndiaCos
IndiaCos is a company and GST data provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing ₹0.40 per successful call, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 85 of 100 (Nov 2026).
PatSeer
PatSeer is a IP tech provider: no public API found, no public MCP server found, pricing subscription, prices not published, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 26 of 100 (Nov 2026).

How do IndiaCos and PatSeer score?

IndiaCos scores 85, PatSeer scores 26 out of 100. The gap is 59 points.

IndiaCos
JurisGrid score 85 out of 100
PatSeer
JurisGrid score 26 out of 100
Data coverage and depthweight 20%
IndiaCos4 of 4
PatSeer2 of 4
Freshness and update cadenceweight 12%
IndiaCos2 of 4
PatSeer0 of 4
API availabilityweight 15%
IndiaCos4 of 4
PatSeer0 of 4
MCP and agent readinessweight 13%
IndiaCos4 of 4
PatSeer0 of 4
Pricing transparencyweight 12%
IndiaCos4 of 4
PatSeer1 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trialweight 10%
IndiaCos4 of 4
PatSeer3 of 4
Documentation and developer experienceweight 8%
IndiaCos3 of 4
PatSeer0 of 4
Track record and trustweight 5%
IndiaCos0 of 4
PatSeer0 of 4
Product depth beyond dataweight 5%
IndiaCos2 of 4
PatSeer4 of 4
Show scorecard as a table
CriterionWeightIndiaCosPatSeer
Data coverage and depth204 of 42 of 4
Freshness and update cadence122 of 40 of 4
API availability154 of 40 of 4
MCP and agent readiness134 of 40 of 4
Pricing transparency124 of 41 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trial104 of 43 of 4
Documentation and developer experience83 of 40 of 4
Track record and trust50 of 40 of 4
Product depth beyond data52 of 44 of 4
Total score1008526

Which features does each one have?

The matrix lists patent search features relevant to ip tech, as published by each provider.

Feature matrix
Feature matrixIndiaCosPatSeer
Data
TrademarksYesNot published
Access
REST APIYesNot published
MCP serverYesNot published
Bulk exportPartialNot published
Developer
OpenAPI specificationYesNot published
OAuth sign-inYesNot published
Commercial
Free credit or free tierYesNot published
Pay per call pricingYesNot published
Self-serve sign-upYesNot published
Public pricingYesNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.

How much do IndiaCos and PatSeer cost?

IndiaCos: ₹0.40 per successful call. PatSeer: prices not published.

Pricing
PricingIndiaCosPatSeer
Pricing modelPay per callSubscription
Public price₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription.Not published
Free tier₹50 free credit on signup, no card neededNot published
Minimum commitmentNone: prepaid wallet, no subscriptionNot published
SourcePricing pagePricing pageopens the source page

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Do IndiaCos and PatSeer have an API and an MCP server?

IndiaCos: public REST API, public MCP server. PatSeer: no public API found, no public MCP server found.

Access: API and MCP
AccessIndiaCosPatSeer
REST APIPublic REST API
https://indiacos.com/api/v1
Not published
MCP serverPublic MCP server
https://indiacos.com/mcp
Not published
AuthenticationBearer API key or X-API-Key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP serverNot published
DocsAPI docsNot published
Sign-upSelf-serveSelf-serve
Free tier₹50 free credit on signup, no card neededNot published
Rate limitsNot publishedNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

IndiaCos request example
# Company master data by CIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/company/{CIN}" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"

# GST registration by GSTIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/gst/{GSTIN}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"

What data does each one cover?

IndiaCos lists 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPs (companies and llps), as of Nov 2026. PatSeer lists Worldwide patent database across 110 patent authorities; Indian legal status from InPASS, as of Nov 2026.

Coverage
CoverageIndiaCosPatSeer
Sources and records
  • Companies and LLPs: 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPsSource
  • GST registrations: 67,05,270 registrations; full details for GSTINs registered 2025-01-01 to 2026-05-31Source
  • Intellectual property: 34,76,034 trade marks, 10,90,748 patent applications, 2,05,377 designs and 2,78,307 copyrightsSource
  • MSMEs and defaulters: 4,66,88,220 MSME records (loading continues state by state) and 7,21,017 defaulter entriesSource
Update cadenceDirectors, charges and GST filings refreshed 23 Oct 2026; MCA monthly lists to 2026-08-31; company master date differs per companyNot published
As ofNov 2026Nov 2026

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Which one should you choose?

IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents needing Indian patent records: public API, MCP server, per-call prices, self-serve sign-up.

Choose IndiaCos if

  • you want Indian patent applications (10,90,748 from the Patent Office Journal, 2005 onwards) by API, searchable by words, IPC, office, journal issue or applicant CIN
  • you want applicants joined to company records, so a company's patents are one call away
  • you want trade marks, designs and copyrights on the same key
  • you want AI agents to call IP records through a public MCP server with OAuth and an agent sign-up flow
  • you want a flat ₹0.40 per successful call, errors and not-found calls free, and ₹50 free credit before you pay

Skip it if you need novelty, invalidity or freedom to operate analysis, or worldwide patents: IndiaCos returns Indian Patent Office Journal records. Data use is limited to internal business use and showing records to your own users; resale and AI training need a written licence.

Choose PatSeer if

  • you want a worldwide database across 110 patent authorities with Indian legal status from InPASS
  • you want IP8 decision intelligence for novelty, invalidity, freedom to operate and portfolio analysis
  • you want a 2-week trial with no contract or payment card before a flat fee subscription

Skip it if you need an API, an MCP server or published prices: PatSeer shows "Contact us for pricing" and no API on the pages reviewed.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for patent search, IndiaCos and PatSeer?

IndiaCos is the stronger choice for developers and AI agents that need Indian patent records by API. PatSeer is the better fit for patent professionals who want worldwide search and analytics. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.

Does PatSeer have an API or an MCP server?

No API is mentioned on the PatSeer pages reviewed, and no public MCP server was found. IndiaCos offers a REST API at indiacos.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI spec and an MCP server at indiacos.com/mcp with OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.

How much does PatSeer cost compared with IndiaCos?

PatSeer shows "Contact us for pricing" on Explorer, Premier, ProX and Designs, with a flat fee subscription and a 2-week trial. IndiaCos charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.

Can an AI agent use IndiaCos and PatSeer?

Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaCos: it runs a public MCP server with 25 tools covering companies, GST, directors, court cases and IP records. PatSeer shows no public MCP server or API in this review, so an agent has no documented interface. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.

When should you choose PatSeer instead of IndiaCos?

Choose PatSeer when you want a worldwide database across 110 patent authorities, IP8 decision intelligence for novelty, invalidity and freedom to operate, or a 2-week trial before a subscription. Choose IndiaCos less readily when you need analysis rather than records.

What data does IndiaCos cover compared with PatSeer?

IndiaCos covers 34,76,034 trade marks (Journal, 2014 onwards), 10,90,748 patent applications (Journal, 2005 onwards), 2,05,377 registered designs (2009 onwards) and 2,78,307 copyrights, with trade marks and patents linked to company CINs. PatSeer says it covers 110 patent authorities worldwide and names India only for legal status from InPASS. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts.

Also compared

Other ip tech comparisons on JurisGrid.

IndiaCos vs IPGO

IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: a public API, MCP server, per-call prices and self-serve sign-up for trade mark, patent, design and copyright records.

Reviewed

IndiaCos profilePatSeer profileBest copyright registration search tools for IndiaIP Tech providersIP tech APIs and MCP serversDesign registration search APIPatent search APIHow JurisGrid scores

Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for IndiaCos, PatSeer.