AuthBridge vs Signzy vs IndiaCos
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Comparison, Company data
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. QorpIQ shows a public API and published prices but not a public MCP server or self-serve sign-up. Pick QorpIQ for MCA-native company, director and charge checks priced per call.
Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 10 Nov 2026 · How we score
IndiaCos scores 85, QorpIQ scores 29 out of 100. The gap is 56 points.
| Criterion | Weight | IndiaCos | QorpIQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data coverage and depth | 20 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Freshness and update cadence | 12 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| API availability | 15 | 4 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| MCP and agent readiness | 13 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Pricing transparency | 12 | 4 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Self-serve sign-up and free trial | 10 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Documentation and developer experience | 8 | 3 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Track record and trust | 5 | 0 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Product depth beyond data | 5 | 2 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Total score | 100 | 85 | 29 |
The matrix lists company data features relevant to company and gst data, as published by each provider.
| Feature matrix | IndiaCos | QorpIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Data | ||
| Court record check | Partial | Not published |
| Company master data | Yes | Yes |
| GST lookup | Yes | Yes |
| Director data | Yes | Yes |
| Trademarks | Yes | Not published |
| Charges and defaulter lists | Yes | Yes |
| Access | ||
| REST API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Not published |
| Bulk export | Partial | Not published |
| Developer | ||
| OpenAPI specification | Yes | Not published |
| OAuth sign-in | Yes | Not published |
| Commercial | ||
| Free credit or free tier | Yes | Not published |
| Pay per call pricing | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve sign-up | Yes | No |
| Public pricing | Yes | Partial |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.
IndiaCos: ₹0.40 per successful call. QorpIQ: public prices.
| Pricing | IndiaCos | QorpIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per call | Pay per call |
| Public price | ₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription. | Priced per call from prepaid balance, no per-call amounts shown; non-API full company report Rs 249, document pack Rs 199 |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Minimum commitment | None: prepaid wallet, no subscription | Not published |
| Source | Pricing page | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos: public REST API, public MCP server. QorpIQ: public REST API, no public MCP server found.
| Access | IndiaCos | QorpIQ |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | Public REST APIhttps://indiacos.com/api/v1 | Public REST API |
| MCP server | Public MCP serverhttps://indiacos.com/mcp | Not published |
| Authentication | Bearer API key or X-API-Key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP server | Not published |
| Docs | API docs | API docsopens the provider's docs |
| Sign-up | Self-serve | Through sales |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Rate limits | Not published | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
# Company master data by CIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/company/{CIN}" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"
# GST registration by GSTIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/gst/{GSTIN}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"IndiaCos lists 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPs (companies and llps), as of Nov 2026. QorpIQ lists company master, director verification, charges, filing health, PAN, GST (checks and data types listed), as of Nov 2026.
| Coverage | IndiaCos | QorpIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sources and records |
|
|
| Update cadence | Directors, charges and GST filings refreshed 23 Oct 2026; MCA monthly lists to 2026-08-31; company master date differs per company | Not published |
| As of | Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Skip it if you need audited financial statements or a fixed annual fee with a contract: IndiaCos is a prepaid per-call service built from public records, and its company master date differs by company.
Skip it if you need a public MCP server or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for QorpIQ in this review.
IndiaCos is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need company data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. QorpIQ is the better fit for MCA-native company, director and charge checks priced per call. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.
QorpIQ offers a public API with published documentation. No public MCP server was found for QorpIQ. IndiaCos offers a REST API at indiacos.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI 3.1 spec and an MCP server at indiacos.com/mcp with OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.
QorpIQ publishes its pricing: Priced per call from prepaid balance, no per-call amounts shown; non-API full company report Rs 249, document pack Rs 199. IndiaCos charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.
Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaCos: it runs a public MCP server with 25 tools covering companies, GST, directors, court cases and IP records. QorpIQ shows no public MCP server in this review, so an agent would need a custom wrapper around its API. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.
Choose QorpIQ when you want company master, director, charge and filing health checks plus a penalty and adjudication check. It is also a good fit when you want prepaid per-call credits and a non-API full company report at Rs 249. Choose IndiaCos less readily when you need audited financial statements or a fixed annual fee with a contract: IndiaCos is a prepaid per-call service built from public records, and its company master date differs by company.
IndiaCos covers 32,85,193 companies, 5,95,467 LLPs and 67,05,270 GST registrations, with directors, charges, court case summaries and 34,76,034 trade marks. As published, QorpIQ covers: company master, director verification, charges, filing health, PAN, GST. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.
Other company and gst data comparisons on JurisGrid.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for IndiaCos, QorpIQ.