MarkSimpl vs TMSearch.ai vs IndiaCos
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: public per-call prices, an MCP server and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Comparison, IP tech
IndiaCos is the stronger pick on access: public per-call prices, an MCP server and self-serve sign-up. TMSearch.ai has a documented trademark search API with phonetic and conceptual matching and alerts, but prices are by request and no MCP server was found. Pick TMSearch.ai for similarity matching.
Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 11 Nov 2026 · How we score
IndiaCos scores 85, TMSearch.ai scores 36 out of 100. The gap is 49 points.
| Criterion | Weight | IndiaCos | TMSearch.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data coverage and depth | 20 | 4 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| Freshness and update cadence | 12 | 2 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| API availability | 15 | 4 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| MCP and agent readiness | 13 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Pricing transparency | 12 | 4 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Self-serve sign-up and free trial | 10 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Documentation and developer experience | 8 | 3 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Track record and trust | 5 | 0 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Product depth beyond data | 5 | 2 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Total score | 100 | 85 | 36 |
The matrix lists trademark search features relevant to ip tech, as published by each provider.
| Feature matrix | IndiaCos | TMSearch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Data | ||
| Trademarks | Yes | Yes |
| Access | ||
| REST API | Yes | Yes |
| MCP server | Yes | Not published |
| Bulk export | Partial | Not published |
| Developer | ||
| OpenAPI specification | Yes | Not published |
| OAuth sign-in | Yes | Not published |
| Commercial | ||
| Free credit or free tier | Yes | Not published |
| Pay per call pricing | Yes | Not published |
| Self-serve sign-up | Yes | Not published |
| Public pricing | Yes | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.
IndiaCos: ₹0.40 per successful call. TMSearch.ai: prices not published.
| Pricing | IndiaCos | TMSearch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per call | Not published |
| Public price | ₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription. | Not published |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Minimum commitment | None: prepaid wallet, no subscription | Not published |
| Source | Pricing page | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos: public REST API, public MCP server. TMSearch.ai: public REST API, no public MCP server found.
| Access | IndiaCos | TMSearch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | Public REST APIhttps://indiacos.com/api/v1 | Public REST API |
| MCP server | Public MCP serverhttps://indiacos.com/mcp | Not published |
| Authentication | Bearer API key or X-API-Key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP server | Not published |
| Docs | API docs | API docsopens the provider's docs |
| Sign-up | Self-serve | Not published |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published |
| Rate limits | Not published | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
# Company master data by CIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/company/{CIN}" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"
# GST registration by GSTIN
curl -s "https://indiacos.com/api/v1/gst/{GSTIN}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $INDIACOS_API_KEY"IndiaCos lists 32,85,193 companies and 5,95,467 LLPs (companies and llps), as of Nov 2026. TMSearch.ai lists India: 7,040,256 trademarks in the homepage summary table (the page defines "protected" unclearly); 40 trademark offices as of June 2026, as of Nov 2026.
| Coverage | IndiaCos | TMSearch.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Sources and records |
|
|
| Update cadence | Directors, charges and GST filings refreshed 23 Oct 2026; MCA monthly lists to 2026-08-31; company master date differs per company | Not published |
| As of | Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick on access: public per-call prices, an MCP server and self-serve sign-up.
Skip it if you need phonetic or logo image similarity search, watch alerts, opposition data or filing: the OpenAPI spec reviewed describes word, proprietor, class, office and journal filters only. Data use is limited to internal business use and showing records to your own users; resale and AI training need a written licence.
Skip it if you need published prices, an MCP server or links to companies and court cases: prices are by "Request offer" and no MCP server was found for TMSearch.ai.
IndiaCos is the stronger choice for developers and AI agents that want public prices, an MCP server and self-serve sign-up. TMSearch.ai is the better fit when phonetic and conceptual matching and new-filing alerts matter most. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.
TMSearch.ai documents a trademark search API (with owner and representative search added in January 2026), but no public MCP server was found. IndiaCos offers a REST API at indiacos.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI spec and an MCP server at indiacos.com/mcp with OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.
TMSearch.ai shows no prices; its API and White Label products use "Request offer" buttons. IndiaCos charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.
Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaCos: it runs a public MCP server with 25 tools covering companies, GST, directors, court cases and IP records. TMSearch.ai has an API but no public MCP server in this review. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.
Choose TMSearch.ai when you want phonetic, misspelling and conceptual matching, alerts on new filings, or trademarks from other offices beside India. Choose IndiaCos less readily when similarity scoring is the main need, since its spec describes word and filter search.
IndiaCos covers 34,76,034 trade marks (Journal, 2014 onwards), 10,90,748 patent applications (Journal, 2005 onwards), 2,05,377 registered designs (2009 onwards) and 2,78,307 copyrights, with trade marks and patents linked to company CINs. TMSearch.ai lists India at 7,040,256 trademarks in its homepage table (a vendor figure; the page defines "protected" unclearly). JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts.
Other ip tech comparisons on JurisGrid.
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: public per-call prices, an MCP server and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IP India Public Search is the official free source for manual checks.
Reviewed
IndiaCos is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: a public API, MCP server, per-call prices and self-serve sign-up for trade mark, patent, design and copyright records.
Reviewed
Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for IndiaCos, TMSearch.ai.