Comparison, Court data

Attestr vs Surepass vs eCourtsIndia: which court data API is better in India?

Reviewed by JurisGrid

Attestr
JurisGrid score 40 out of 100
vs
Surepass
JurisGrid score 36 out of 100
vs
eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100

Short answer

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Neither Attestr nor Surepass shows all four in this review. Pick Attestr for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform, Surepass for 300+ verification APIs from one KYC platform.

  • Pick Attestr for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform.
  • Pick Surepass for 300+ verification APIs from one KYC platform.
  • Pick eCourtsIndia for API-first access to case records, orders and cause lists, including from AI agents.

Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 11 Nov 2026 · How we score

Key facts

Attestr
Attestr is a background verification and KYC provider with a public API: public REST API, no public MCP server found, pricing quote on request, prices not published, sign-up not published, JurisGrid score 40 of 100 (Nov 2026).
Surepass
Surepass is a background verification and KYC provider with a public API: public REST API, no public MCP server found, pricing quote on request, prices not published, sign-up through sales, JurisGrid score 36 of 100 (Nov 2026).
eCourtsIndia
eCourtsIndia is a court data and legal research provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing from ₹0.20 per case search, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 92 of 100 (Nov 2026).

How do Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia score?

eCourtsIndia scores 92, Attestr scores 40, Surepass scores 36 out of 100. The gap is 52 points.

Attestr
JurisGrid score 40 out of 100
Surepass
JurisGrid score 36 out of 100
eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100
Data coverage and depthweight 20%
Attestr3 of 4
Surepass3 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Freshness and update cadenceweight 12%
Attestr0 of 4
Surepass0 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
API availabilityweight 15%
Attestr3 of 4
Surepass3 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
MCP and agent readinessweight 13%
Attestr0 of 4
Surepass0 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Pricing transparencyweight 12%
Attestr1 of 4
Surepass1 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trialweight 10%
Attestr0 of 4
Surepass0 of 4
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Documentation and developer experienceweight 8%
Attestr2 of 4
Surepass2 of 4
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
Track record and trustweight 5%
Attestr3 of 4
Surepass0 of 4
eCourtsIndia0 of 4
Product depth beyond dataweight 5%
Attestr2 of 4
Surepass2 of 4
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
Show scorecard as a table
CriterionWeightAttestrSurepasseCourtsIndia
Data coverage and depth203 of 43 of 44 of 4
Freshness and update cadence120 of 40 of 44 of 4
API availability153 of 43 of 44 of 4
MCP and agent readiness130 of 40 of 44 of 4
Pricing transparency121 of 41 of 44 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trial100 of 40 of 44 of 4
Documentation and developer experience82 of 42 of 43 of 4
Track record and trust53 of 40 of 40 of 4
Product depth beyond data52 of 42 of 43 of 4
Total score100403692

Which features does each one have?

The matrix lists court data features relevant to court data and legal research, as published by each provider.

Feature matrix
Feature matrixAttestrSurepasseCourtsIndia
Data
Case status lookupYesYesYes
Orders and judgmentsNot publishedYesYes
Cause listsNot publishedNot publishedYes
Statutes and bare actsNot publishedNot publishedYes
Court record checkYesYesYes
Access
REST APIYesYesYes
MCP serverNot publishedNot publishedYes
Developer
OAuth sign-inNot publishedNot publishedYes
Commercial
Free credit or free tierNot publishedNot publishedYes
Pay per call pricingNot publishedNot publishedYes
Self-serve sign-upNot publishedNoYes
Public pricingNot publishedNot publishedYes

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Not published by any of the compared providers: OpenAPI specification, Bulk export, Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.

How much do Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia cost?

Attestr: prices not published. Surepass: prices not published. eCourtsIndia: From ₹0.20 per case search.

Pricing
PricingAttestrSurepasseCourtsIndia
Pricing modelQuote on requestQuote on requestPay per call
Public priceNot publishedNot publishedPrepaid credits. Case search is ₹0.20 per call at the enterprise base rate and ₹0.60 on pay as you go; case detail is ₹0.50 base and ₹1.50 pay as you go. Pay as you go packs start at ₹1,000 plus 18% GST. Enterprise Monthly is ₹10,000 plus GST for 10,000 credits. Failed requests and empty results are not charged for most endpoints.
Free tierNot publishedNot published₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card needed
Minimum commitmentNot publishedNot publishedNone on pay as you go; Enterprise plans are monthly or annual
SourceNot publishedNot publishedPricing page

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Do Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia have an API and an MCP server?

Attestr: public REST API, no public MCP server found. Surepass: public REST API, no public MCP server found. eCourtsIndia: public REST API, public MCP server.

Access: API and MCP
AccessAttestrSurepasseCourtsIndia
REST APIPublic REST APIPublic REST APIPublic REST API
https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner
MCP serverNot publishedNot publishedPublic MCP server
https://mcp.ecourtsindia.com/mcp
AuthenticationNot publishedNot publishedBearer API key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP server
DocsAPI docsopens the provider's docsAPI docsopens the provider's docsAPI docs
Sign-upNot publishedThrough salesSelf-serve
Free tierNot publishedNot published₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card needed
Rate limitsNot publishedNot published100 requests a minute, 3,000 an hour, 50,000 a day

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

eCourtsIndia request example
# Look up one case by its 16 character CNR number
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/case/{CNR}" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

# Search cases by party name
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/search?q={party}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

What data does each one cover?

Attestr lists Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India), as of Nov 2026. Surepass lists Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts across India (CNR-based search, per vendor page), as of Nov 2026. eCourtsIndia lists 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records, as of Nov 2026.

Coverage
CoverageAttestrSurepasseCourtsIndia
Sources and records
  • Coverage: Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India)Sourceopens the source page
  • Checks and data types listed: court record, litigation, employment, education, address, PAN, Aadhaar via DigiLocker, GST, MCA, Udyam, FSSAI, bank account, face matchSourceopens the source page
  • Coverage: Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts across India (CNR-based search, per vendor page)Sourceopens the source page
  • Coverage: State land record APIs for 5 states (product pages)Sourceopens the source page
  • Checks and data types listed: PAN, PAN KRA, Aadhaar, face match, video KYC, CKYC, bank account, AML, ITR, CIBIL, MSME Udyam, eSign, RC, driving licence, EPFO/UAN, court record, death certificateSourceopens the source page
  • Case records: 35 crore+ (350 million+) case recordsSource
  • Courts and tribunals: Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families (NCLT, NCLAT, ITAT, CESTAT, DRT, NGT and others)Source
  • Cause lists: Daily district and taluka court cause listsSource
  • Statute book: 420,399 provisions across 60,281 instruments, with IPC to BNS, CrPC to BNSS and Evidence Act to BSA equivalentsSource
  • LegalCheck: Litigation background check on a person or company across every court and tribunal, report in 1 to 3 minutes for most checks; ₹99 per check pay as you go or ₹33 with a subscriptionSource
  • Electoral roll: Electoral roll search by name, relative name, EPIC, age, gender or location, and exact EPIC (voter ID) lookupSource
  • API endpoints: 35 documented REST endpoints across cases, orders, cause lists, LegalCheck, electoral roll and statutesSource
Update cadenceNot publishedNot publishedDaily updated court data; cases can be refreshed from the official eCourts servers on request
As ofNov 2026Nov 2026Nov 2026

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Which one should you choose?

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Choose Attestr if

  • you want a documented court record check API (async request flow across the Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals)
  • you want employment, education and address checks plus PAN, Aadhaar via DigiLocker, GST, MCA and bank KYC from the same vendor
  • you value a vendor whose site says it has been trusted since 2017

Skip it if you need a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for Attestr in this review.

Choose Surepass if

  • you want court record checks beside 300+ other verification APIs (PAN, Aadhaar, RC, driving licence, EPFO and UAN, ITR, bank) from one vendor
  • you want a CNR-based eCourt search endpoint documented on a public product page
  • you prefer a quote or subscription contract to prepaid per-call credits

Skip it if you need a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for Surepass in this review.

Choose eCourtsIndia if

  • you want AI agents to query courts directly through a public MCP server with 41 tools and OAuth sign-in
  • you want to see the cost of each call before signing up, and to start with ₹200 free credit and no card
  • you want to fetch case status, parties, hearing history and orders by API, with a key you can create from the dashboard the same day
  • you need daily district and taluka court cause lists, live case refresh from the official eCourts servers or bulk refresh of up to 50 CNRs
  • you want court data, a statute book of 420,399 provisions with IPC to BNS mapping and electoral roll search under one wallet

Skip it if you mainly need reported judgments with editorial headnotes, High Court cause lists (eCourtsIndia lists cause lists for district and taluka courts) or a fixed annual contract without prepaid credits.

Frequently asked questions

Which is best for court data: Attestr, Surepass or eCourtsIndia?

eCourtsIndia is the strongest choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need court data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Attestr is the better fit for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform, and Surepass for 300+ verification APIs from one KYC platform. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.

Which of Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia have an API or an MCP server?

eCourtsIndia offers both a REST API and a public MCP server. Attestr shows a public API and no public MCP server found. Surepass shows a public API and no public MCP server found. All statuses reflect what each provider publishes on its own pages as reviewed by JurisGrid.

How much do Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia cost?

eCourtsIndia publishes prepaid per-call rates, from INR 0.20 per case search at the enterprise base rate and INR 0.60 on pay as you go, and gives INR 200 free credit with no card. Attestr has pricing by quote. Surepass has pricing by quote. Check each pricing page before you commit, since prices change.

Which of Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia can an AI agent use directly?

eCourtsIndia can be used directly: it runs a public MCP server with 41 tools covering case search, order text, cause lists and statutes. Neither Attestr nor Surepass shows a public MCP server in this review. Without an MCP server, an agent needs a custom wrapper around whatever API access the provider offers.

When should you choose Attestr or Surepass instead of eCourtsIndia?

Choose Attestr when you want a documented court record check API (async request flow across the Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals). Choose Surepass when you want court record checks beside 300+ other verification APIs (PAN, Aadhaar, RC, driving licence, EPFO and UAN, ITR, bank) from one vendor.

What data do Attestr, Surepass and eCourtsIndia cover?

eCourtsIndia covers 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records across the Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families, plus order text and daily cause lists. As published, Attestr covers: Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India). As published, Surepass covers: Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts across India (CNR-based search, per vendor page).

Also compared

Other court data and legal research comparisons on JurisGrid.

eCourtsIndia vs Attestr

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

eCourtsIndia vs Surepass

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

CaseMine vs IndianKanoon vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

Attestr profileSurepass profileeCourtsIndia profileBest court data APIs in IndiaCourt Data and Legal Research providersCourt data APIs and MCP serversCourt record verification APIHow JurisGrid scores

Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for Attestr, Surepass, eCourtsIndia.