Comparison, Court data

eCourtsIndia vs Attestr: which court data API is better in India?

Reviewed by JurisGrid

eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100
vs
Attestr
JurisGrid score 40 out of 100

Short answer

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Attestr shows a public API but not a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up. Pick Attestr for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform.

  • Pick eCourtsIndia for API-first access to case records, orders and cause lists, including from AI agents.
  • Pick Attestr for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform.

Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 11 Nov 2026 · How we score

Key facts

eCourtsIndia
eCourtsIndia is a court data and legal research provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing from ₹0.20 per case search, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 92 of 100 (Nov 2026).
Attestr
Attestr is a background verification and KYC provider with a public API: public REST API, no public MCP server found, pricing quote on request, prices not published, sign-up not published, JurisGrid score 40 of 100 (Nov 2026).

How do eCourtsIndia and Attestr score?

eCourtsIndia scores 92, Attestr scores 40 out of 100. The gap is 52 points.

eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100
Attestr
JurisGrid score 40 out of 100
Data coverage and depthweight 20%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr3 of 4
Freshness and update cadenceweight 12%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr0 of 4
API availabilityweight 15%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr3 of 4
MCP and agent readinessweight 13%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr0 of 4
Pricing transparencyweight 12%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr1 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trialweight 10%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
Attestr0 of 4
Documentation and developer experienceweight 8%
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
Attestr2 of 4
Track record and trustweight 5%
eCourtsIndia0 of 4
Attestr3 of 4
Product depth beyond dataweight 5%
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
Attestr2 of 4
Show scorecard as a table
CriterionWeighteCourtsIndiaAttestr
Data coverage and depth204 of 43 of 4
Freshness and update cadence124 of 40 of 4
API availability154 of 43 of 4
MCP and agent readiness134 of 40 of 4
Pricing transparency124 of 41 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trial104 of 40 of 4
Documentation and developer experience83 of 42 of 4
Track record and trust50 of 43 of 4
Product depth beyond data53 of 42 of 4
Total score1009240

Which features does each one have?

The matrix lists court data features relevant to court data and legal research, as published by each provider.

Feature matrix
Feature matrixeCourtsIndiaAttestr
Data
Case status lookupYesYes
Orders and judgmentsYesNot published
Cause listsYesNot published
Statutes and bare actsYesNot published
Court record checkYesYes
Access
REST APIYesYes
MCP serverYesNot published
Developer
OAuth sign-inYesNot published
Commercial
Free credit or free tierYesNot published
Pay per call pricingYesNot published
Self-serve sign-upYesNot published
Public pricingYesNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Not published by any of the compared providers: OpenAPI specification, Bulk export, Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.

How much do eCourtsIndia and Attestr cost?

eCourtsIndia: From ₹0.20 per case search. Attestr: prices not published.

Pricing
PricingeCourtsIndiaAttestr
Pricing modelPay per callQuote on request
Public pricePrepaid credits. Case search is ₹0.20 per call at the enterprise base rate and ₹0.60 on pay as you go; case detail is ₹0.50 base and ₹1.50 pay as you go. Pay as you go packs start at ₹1,000 plus 18% GST. Enterprise Monthly is ₹10,000 plus GST for 10,000 credits. Failed requests and empty results are not charged for most endpoints.Not published
Free tier₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card neededNot published
Minimum commitmentNone on pay as you go; Enterprise plans are monthly or annualNot published
SourcePricing pageNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Do eCourtsIndia and Attestr have an API and an MCP server?

eCourtsIndia: public REST API, public MCP server. Attestr: public REST API, no public MCP server found.

Access: API and MCP
AccesseCourtsIndiaAttestr
REST APIPublic REST API
https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner
Public REST API
MCP serverPublic MCP server
https://mcp.ecourtsindia.com/mcp
Not published
AuthenticationBearer API key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP serverNot published
DocsAPI docsAPI docsopens the provider's docs
Sign-upSelf-serveNot published
Free tier₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card neededNot published
Rate limits100 requests a minute, 3,000 an hour, 50,000 a dayNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

eCourtsIndia request example
# Look up one case by its 16 character CNR number
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/case/{CNR}" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

# Search cases by party name
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/search?q={party}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

What data does each one cover?

eCourtsIndia lists 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records, as of Nov 2026. Attestr lists Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India), as of Nov 2026.

Coverage
CoverageeCourtsIndiaAttestr
Sources and records
  • Case records: 35 crore+ (350 million+) case recordsSource
  • Courts and tribunals: Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families (NCLT, NCLAT, ITAT, CESTAT, DRT, NGT and others)Source
  • Cause lists: Daily district and taluka court cause listsSource
  • Statute book: 420,399 provisions across 60,281 instruments, with IPC to BNS, CrPC to BNSS and Evidence Act to BSA equivalentsSource
  • LegalCheck: Litigation background check on a person or company across every court and tribunal, report in 1 to 3 minutes for most checks; ₹99 per check pay as you go or ₹33 with a subscriptionSource
  • Electoral roll: Electoral roll search by name, relative name, EPIC, age, gender or location, and exact EPIC (voter ID) lookupSource
  • API endpoints: 35 documented REST endpoints across cases, orders, cause lists, LegalCheck, electoral roll and statutesSource
  • Coverage: Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India)Sourceopens the source page
  • Checks and data types listed: court record, litigation, employment, education, address, PAN, Aadhaar via DigiLocker, GST, MCA, Udyam, FSSAI, bank account, face matchSourceopens the source page
Update cadenceDaily updated court data; cases can be refreshed from the official eCourts servers on requestNot published
As ofNov 2026Nov 2026

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Which one should you choose?

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Choose eCourtsIndia if

  • you want AI agents to query courts directly through a public MCP server with 41 tools and OAuth sign-in
  • you want to see the cost of each call before signing up, and to start with ₹200 free credit and no card
  • you want to fetch case status, parties, hearing history and orders by API, with a key you can create from the dashboard the same day
  • you need daily district and taluka court cause lists, live case refresh from the official eCourts servers or bulk refresh of up to 50 CNRs
  • you want court data, a statute book of 420,399 provisions with IPC to BNS mapping and electoral roll search under one wallet

Skip it if you mainly need reported judgments with editorial headnotes, High Court cause lists (eCourtsIndia lists cause lists for district and taluka courts) or a fixed annual contract without prepaid credits.

Choose Attestr if

  • you want a documented court record check API (async request flow across the Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals)
  • you want employment, education and address checks plus PAN, Aadhaar via DigiLocker, GST, MCA and bank KYC from the same vendor
  • you value a vendor whose site says it has been trusted since 2017

Skip it if you need a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for Attestr in this review.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for court data, eCourtsIndia or Attestr?

eCourtsIndia is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need court data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. Attestr is the better fit for a documented court record check API inside a BGV and KYC platform. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.

Does Attestr have an API or an MCP server?

Attestr offers a public API with published documentation. No public MCP server was found for Attestr. eCourtsIndia offers a REST API at webapi.ecourtsindia.com with 32 documented endpoints and an MCP server at mcp.ecourtsindia.com with 41 tools and OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.

How much does Attestr cost compared with eCourtsIndia?

Attestr does not publish a full price list in this review (pricing is by quote). eCourtsIndia publishes prepaid per-call rates, from INR 0.20 per case search at the enterprise base rate and INR 0.60 on pay as you go, and gives INR 200 free credit with no card. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.

Can an AI agent use Attestr or eCourtsIndia?

Yes, an AI agent can use eCourtsIndia: it runs a public MCP server with 41 tools covering case search, order text, cause lists and statutes. Attestr shows no public MCP server in this review, so an agent would need a custom wrapper around its API. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.

When should you choose Attestr instead of eCourtsIndia?

Choose Attestr when you want a documented court record check API (async request flow across the Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals). It is also a good fit when you want employment, education and address checks plus PAN, Aadhaar via DigiLocker, GST, MCA and bank KYC from the same vendor.

What data does eCourtsIndia cover compared with Attestr?

eCourtsIndia covers 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records across the Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families, plus order text and daily cause lists. As published, Attestr covers: Supreme Court, High Courts, sessions and magistrate courts, district civil courts and tribunals (India). JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.

Also compared

Other court data and legal research comparisons on JurisGrid.

Attestr vs Surepass vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

CaseMine vs IndianKanoon vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

CaseMine vs Manupatra vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

eCourtsIndia profileAttestr profileBest court data APIs in IndiaCourt Data and Legal Research providersCourt data APIs and MCP serversCourt case status APIeCourt CNR search APICriminal record check APIHow JurisGrid scores

Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for eCourtsIndia, Attestr.