Comparison, Court data

eCourtsIndia vs NearLaw: which court data API is better in India?

Reviewed by JurisGrid

eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100
vs
NearLaw
JurisGrid score 16 out of 100

Short answer

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. NearLaw shows no public API, MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up in this review. Pick NearLaw for bare acts, citation tools and lawyer discovery.

  • Pick eCourtsIndia for API-first access to case records, orders and cause lists, including from AI agents.
  • Pick NearLaw for bare acts, citation tools and lawyer discovery.

Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 11 Nov 2026 · How we score

Key facts

eCourtsIndia
eCourtsIndia is a court data and legal research provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing from ₹0.20 per case search, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 92 of 100 (Nov 2026).
NearLaw
NearLaw is a court data and legal research provider: no public API found, no public MCP server found, pricing not published, sign-up not published, JurisGrid score 16 of 100 (Nov 2026).

How do eCourtsIndia and NearLaw score?

eCourtsIndia scores 92, NearLaw scores 16 out of 100. The gap is 76 points.

eCourtsIndia
JurisGrid score 92 out of 100
NearLaw
JurisGrid score 16 out of 100
Data coverage and depthweight 20%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw2 of 4
Freshness and update cadenceweight 12%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
API availabilityweight 15%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
MCP and agent readinessweight 13%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
Pricing transparencyweight 12%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trialweight 10%
eCourtsIndia4 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
Documentation and developer experienceweight 8%
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
NearLaw0 of 4
Track record and trustweight 5%
eCourtsIndia0 of 4
NearLaw2 of 4
Product depth beyond dataweight 5%
eCourtsIndia3 of 4
NearLaw3 of 4
Show scorecard as a table
CriterionWeighteCourtsIndiaNearLaw
Data coverage and depth204 of 42 of 4
Freshness and update cadence124 of 40 of 4
API availability154 of 40 of 4
MCP and agent readiness134 of 40 of 4
Pricing transparency124 of 40 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trial104 of 40 of 4
Documentation and developer experience83 of 40 of 4
Track record and trust50 of 42 of 4
Product depth beyond data53 of 43 of 4
Total score1009216

Which features does each one have?

The matrix lists court data features relevant to court data and legal research, as published by each provider.

Feature matrix
Feature matrixeCourtsIndiaNearLaw
Data
Case status lookupYesNot published
Orders and judgmentsYesNot published
Cause listsYesNot published
Statutes and bare actsYesYes
Court record checkYesNot published
Access
REST APIYesNot published
MCP serverYesNot published
Developer
OAuth sign-inYesNot published
Commercial
Free credit or free tierYesNot published
Pay per call pricingYesNot published
Self-serve sign-upYesNot published
Public pricingYesNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Not published by any of the compared providers: OpenAPI specification, Bulk export, Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.

How much do eCourtsIndia and NearLaw cost?

eCourtsIndia: From ₹0.20 per case search. NearLaw: prices not published.

Pricing
PricingeCourtsIndiaNearLaw
Pricing modelPay per callNot published
Public pricePrepaid credits. Case search is ₹0.20 per call at the enterprise base rate and ₹0.60 on pay as you go; case detail is ₹0.50 base and ₹1.50 pay as you go. Pay as you go packs start at ₹1,000 plus 18% GST. Enterprise Monthly is ₹10,000 plus GST for 10,000 credits. Failed requests and empty results are not charged for most endpoints.Not published
Free tier₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card neededNot published
Minimum commitmentNone on pay as you go; Enterprise plans are monthly or annualNot published
SourcePricing pageNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Do eCourtsIndia and NearLaw have an API and an MCP server?

eCourtsIndia: public REST API, public MCP server. NearLaw: no public API found, no public MCP server found.

Access: API and MCP
AccesseCourtsIndiaNearLaw
REST APIPublic REST API
https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner
Not published
MCP serverPublic MCP server
https://mcp.ecourtsindia.com/mcp
Not published
AuthenticationBearer API key; OAuth 2.1 for the MCP serverNot published
DocsAPI docsNot published
Sign-upSelf-serveNot published
Free tier₹200 free credit on signup, no credit card neededNot published
Rate limits100 requests a minute, 3,000 an hour, 50,000 a dayNot published

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

eCourtsIndia request example
# Look up one case by its 16 character CNR number
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/case/{CNR}" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

# Search cases by party name
curl -s "https://webapi.ecourtsindia.com/api/partner/search?q={party}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $ECOURTSINDIA_API_KEY"

What data does each one cover?

eCourtsIndia lists 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records, as of Nov 2026. NearLaw does not publish a coverage summary on the pages JurisGrid reviewed.

Coverage
CoverageeCourtsIndiaNearLaw
Sources and records
  • Case records: 35 crore+ (350 million+) case recordsSource
  • Courts and tribunals: Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families (NCLT, NCLAT, ITAT, CESTAT, DRT, NGT and others)Source
  • Cause lists: Daily district and taluka court cause listsSource
  • Statute book: 420,399 provisions across 60,281 instruments, with IPC to BNS, CrPC to BNSS and Evidence Act to BSA equivalentsSource
  • LegalCheck: Litigation background check on a person or company across every court and tribunal, report in 1 to 3 minutes for most checks; ₹99 per check pay as you go or ₹33 with a subscriptionSource
  • Electoral roll: Electoral roll search by name, relative name, EPIC, age, gender or location, and exact EPIC (voter ID) lookupSource
  • API endpoints: 35 documented REST endpoints across cases, orders, cause lists, LegalCheck, electoral roll and statutesSource
  • Coverage: Not published
Update cadenceDaily updated court data; cases can be refreshed from the official eCourts servers on requestNot published
As ofNov 2026Nov 2026

"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.

Which one should you choose?

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Choose eCourtsIndia if

  • you want to fetch case status, parties, hearing history and orders by API, with a key you can create from the dashboard the same day
  • you want AI agents to query courts directly through a public MCP server with 41 tools and OAuth sign-in
  • you want to see the cost of each call before signing up, and to start with ₹200 free credit and no card
  • you need daily district and taluka court cause lists, live case refresh from the official eCourts servers or bulk refresh of up to 50 CNRs
  • you want court data, a statute book of 420,399 provisions with IPC to BNS mapping and electoral roll search under one wallet

Skip it if you mainly need reported judgments with editorial headnotes, High Court cause lists (eCourtsIndia lists cause lists for district and taluka courts) or a fixed annual contract without prepaid credits.

Choose NearLaw if

  • you want bare acts and citation tools in a research database
  • you want lawyer discovery alongside legal research
  • you weigh operating history, and JurisGrid found public signals of it for NearLaw

Skip it if you need a public API, a public MCP server, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for NearLaw in this review.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for court data, eCourtsIndia or NearLaw?

eCourtsIndia is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need court data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. NearLaw is the better fit for bare acts, citation tools and lawyer discovery. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.

Does NearLaw have an API or an MCP server?

NearLaw has no API documentation in this review. No public MCP server was found for NearLaw. eCourtsIndia offers a REST API at webapi.ecourtsindia.com with 32 documented endpoints and an MCP server at mcp.ecourtsindia.com with 41 tools and OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.

How much does NearLaw cost compared with eCourtsIndia?

NearLaw does not publish a full price list in this review. eCourtsIndia publishes prepaid per-call rates, from INR 0.20 per case search at the enterprise base rate and INR 0.60 on pay as you go, and gives INR 200 free credit with no card. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.

Can an AI agent use NearLaw or eCourtsIndia?

Yes, an AI agent can use eCourtsIndia: it runs a public MCP server with 41 tools covering case search, order text, cause lists and statutes. NearLaw shows no public MCP server in this review, so there is no documented API for an agent to call. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.

When should you choose NearLaw instead of eCourtsIndia?

Choose NearLaw when you want bare acts and citation tools in a research database. It is also a good fit when you want lawyer discovery alongside legal research. Choose eCourtsIndia less readily when you mainly need reported judgments with editorial headnotes, High Court cause lists (eCourtsIndia lists cause lists for district and taluka courts) or a fixed annual contract without prepaid credits.

What data does eCourtsIndia cover compared with NearLaw?

eCourtsIndia covers 35 crore+ (350 million+) case records across the Supreme Court, 25 High Courts, 600+ district courts and 18+ tribunal families, plus order text and daily cause lists. NearLaw does not publish coverage figures on the pages reviewed. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.

Also compared

Other court data and legal research comparisons on JurisGrid.

Attestr vs Surepass vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

CaseMine vs IndianKanoon vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

CaseMine vs Manupatra vs eCourtsIndia

eCourtsIndia is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.

Reviewed

eCourtsIndia profileNearLaw profileBest court data APIs in IndiaCourt Data and Legal Research providersCourt data APIs and MCP serversHow JurisGrid scores

Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for eCourtsIndia, NearLaw.