1acre vs Landeed vs IndiaPropertyRegister
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Comparison, Property
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. India-MCP shows a public MCP server and self-serve sign-up but not a public API or published prices. Pick India-MCP for free open-source MCP servers including Digital Bhulekh.
Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 10 Nov 2026 · How we score
IndiaPropertyRegister scores 77, India-MCP scores 21 out of 100. The gap is 56 points.
| Criterion | Weight | IndiaPropertyRegister | India-MCP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data coverage and depth | 20 | 3 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Freshness and update cadence | 12 | 1 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| API availability | 15 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| MCP and agent readiness | 13 | 4 of 4 | 3 of 4 |
| Pricing transparency | 12 | 4 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Self-serve sign-up and free trial | 10 | 4 of 4 | 2 of 4 |
| Documentation and developer experience | 8 | 3 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Track record and trust | 5 | 0 of 4 | 0 of 4 |
| Product depth beyond data | 5 | 2 of 4 | 1 of 4 |
| Total score | 100 | 77 | 21 |
The matrix lists land and property data features relevant to land and property records, as published by each provider.
| Feature matrix | IndiaPropertyRegister | India-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Data | ||
| Land records | Yes | Yes |
| RERA projects | Yes | Not published |
| Auctions | Yes | Not published |
| Circle rates | Yes | Not published |
| Access | ||
| REST API | Yes | Not published |
| MCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk export | Partial | Not published |
| Developer | ||
| OpenAPI specification | Yes | Not published |
| OAuth sign-in | Yes | Not published |
| Commercial | ||
| Free credit or free tier | Yes | Not published |
| Pay per call pricing | Yes | Not published |
| Self-serve sign-up | Yes | Yes |
| Public pricing | Yes | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.
IndiaPropertyRegister: ₹0.40 per successful call. India-MCP: prices not published.
| Pricing | IndiaPropertyRegister | India-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Pay per call | Free |
| Public price | ₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription; each key has a daily cap of 100,000 calls. | Not published |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published (open source) |
| Minimum commitment | None: prepaid wallet, no subscription | Not published |
| Source | Pricing page | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaPropertyRegister: public REST API, public MCP server. India-MCP: no public API found, public MCP server.
| Access | IndiaPropertyRegister | India-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | Public REST APIhttps://indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1 | Not published |
| MCP server | Public MCP serverhttps://indiapropertyregister.com/mcp | Public MCP server |
| Authentication | Bearer API key; OAuth 2.1 with an emailed sign-in code for the MCP server | Not published |
| Docs | API docs | Not published |
| Sign-up | Self-serve | Self-serve |
| Free tier | ₹50 free credit on signup, no card needed | Not published (open source) |
| Rate limits | Daily safety cap of 100,000 calls per key | Not published |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
# Find a village or place by name
curl -s "https://indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1/search?q=rampur" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $IPR_API_KEY"
# Plots in a village by its LGD code
curl -s "https://indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1/village/{lgd}/plots" -H "Authorization: Bearer $IPR_API_KEY"IndiaPropertyRegister lists About 20 crore plots (19,81,51,667) with published holders; depth varies by state, as of Nov 2026. India-MCP does not publish a coverage summary on the pages JurisGrid reviewed.
| Coverage | IndiaPropertyRegister | India-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Sources and records |
|
|
| Update cadence | Records are loaded state by state and the coverage page tracks 332 sources, but no refresh cadence is stated. | Not published |
| As of | Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Skip it if you need a certified copy, a title opinion or uniform plot level depth in every state: IndiaPropertyRegister states that plot depth varies by state and that its records are not proof of title.
Skip it if you need a public API or published prices: these were not found for India-MCP in this review.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need land and property data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. India-MCP is the better fit for free open-source MCP servers including Digital Bhulekh. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.
India-MCP has no API documentation in this review. India-MCP lists a public MCP server. IndiaPropertyRegister offers a REST API at indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI spec and an MCP server at indiapropertyregister.com/mcp with 29 tools and OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.
India-MCP does not publish a full price list in this review. IndiaPropertyRegister charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.
Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaPropertyRegister: it runs a 29 tool MCP server covering places, plots, owners, rates, auctions and RERA projects. India-MCP also lists a public MCP server, so either one can serve an agent. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.
Choose India-MCP when you want free open-source MCP servers for several Indian APIs, including Digital Bhulekh land records. It is also a good fit when you are comfortable running an npm package yourself. Choose IndiaPropertyRegister less readily when you need a certified copy, a title opinion or uniform plot level depth in every state: IndiaPropertyRegister states that plot depth varies by state and that its records are not proof of title.
IndiaPropertyRegister covers about 20 crore plots, 5.1 crore municipal properties, 1.3 crore registered deeds and 1.69 lakh RERA projects across 36 states and UTs, with plot depth varying by state. India-MCP does not publish coverage figures on the pages reviewed. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.
Other land and property records comparisons on JurisGrid.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Reviewed
Spotted something out of date in this comparison? Request a correction for IndiaPropertyRegister, India-MCP.