IndiaPropertyRegister vs PropContext: which land and property data API is better in India?
Reviewed by JurisGrid
IndiaPropertyRegisterJurisGrid score 77 out of 100
vs
PropContextJurisGrid score 21 out of 100
77 IndiaPropertyRegister21 PropContext
Short answerNov 2026
Short answer
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. PropContext shows a public MCP server but not a public API, published prices or self-serve sign-up. Pick PropContext for RERA-verified Bangalore project details via MCP.
Pick IndiaPropertyRegister for plot, owner, rate, auction and RERA data by API and MCP at a public per-call price.
Pick PropContext for RERA-verified Bangalore project details via MCP.
Based on JurisGrid scores reviewed 10 Nov 2026 · How we score
Key facts
IndiaPropertyRegister
IndiaPropertyRegister is a land and property data provider with a public API and MCP server: public REST API, public MCP server, pricing ₹0.40 per successful call, sign-up self-serve, JurisGrid score 77 of 100 (Nov 2026).
PropContext
PropContext is a land and property data provider with a public MCP server: no public API found, public MCP server, pricing not published, sign-up not published, JurisGrid score 21 of 100 (Nov 2026).
How do IndiaPropertyRegister and PropContext score?
IndiaPropertyRegister scores 77, PropContext scores 21 out of 100. The gap is 56 points.
IndiaPropertyRegisterJurisGrid score 77 out of 100
PropContextJurisGrid score 21 out of 100
Data coverage and depthweight 20%
IPR3 of 4
PropContext2 of 4
Freshness and update cadenceweight 12%
IPR1 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
API availabilityweight 15%
IPR4 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
MCP and agent readinessweight 13%
IPR4 of 4
PropContext3 of 4
Pricing transparencyweight 12%
IPR4 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trialweight 10%
IPR4 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
Documentation and developer experienceweight 8%
IPR3 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
Track record and trustweight 5%
IPR0 of 4
PropContext0 of 4
Product depth beyond dataweight 5%
IPR2 of 4
PropContext1 of 4
Show scorecard as a table
Criterion
Weight
IndiaPropertyRegister
PropContext
Data coverage and depth
20
3 of 4
2 of 4
Freshness and update cadence
12
1 of 4
0 of 4
API availability
15
4 of 4
0 of 4
MCP and agent readiness
13
4 of 4
3 of 4
Pricing transparency
12
4 of 4
0 of 4
Self-serve sign-up and free trial
10
4 of 4
0 of 4
Documentation and developer experience
8
3 of 4
0 of 4
Track record and trust
5
0 of 4
0 of 4
Product depth beyond data
5
2 of 4
1 of 4
Total score
100
77
21
Which features does each one have?
The matrix lists land and property data features relevant to land and property records, as published by each provider.
Feature matrix
Feature matrix
IndiaPropertyRegister
PropContext
Data
Land records
Yes
Not published
RERA projects
Yes
Yes
Auctions
Yes
Not published
Circle rates
Yes
Not published
Access
REST API
Yes
Not published
MCP server
Yes
Yes
Bulk export
Partial
Not published
Developer
OpenAPI specification
Yes
Not published
OAuth sign-in
Yes
Not published
Commercial
Free credit or free tier
Yes
Not published
Pay per call pricing
Yes
Not published
Self-serve sign-up
Yes
Not published
Public pricing
Yes
Not published
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Not published by any of the compared providers: Webhooks, Sandbox or try-it console.
How much do IndiaPropertyRegister and PropContext cost?
IndiaPropertyRegister: ₹0.40 per successful call. PropContext: prices not published.
Pricing
Pricing
IndiaPropertyRegister
PropContext
Pricing model
Pay per call
Not published
Public price
₹0.40 per successful call; errors, not-found and refused calls are free. Prepaid top-ups of ₹500, ₹5,000 and ₹50,000 plus 18% GST. No subscription; each key has a daily cap of 100,000 calls.
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
IndiaPropertyRegister request example
# Find a village or place by name
curl -s "https://indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1/search?q=rampur" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $IPR_API_KEY"
# Plots in a village by its LGD code
curl -s "https://indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1/village/{lgd}/plots" -H "Authorization: Bearer $IPR_API_KEY"
What data does each one cover?
IndiaPropertyRegister lists About 20 crore plots (19,81,51,667) with published holders; depth varies by state, as of Nov 2026. PropContext lists Bangalore, as of Nov 2026.
Coverage
Coverage
IndiaPropertyRegister
PropContext
Sources and records
Plots: About 20 crore plots (19,81,51,667) with published holders; depth varies by stateSource
Places: 36 states and UTs, 783 districts, 6,360 tehsils and 6,83,627 villages with LGD codesSource
City properties, deeds and projects: 5.1 crore municipal properties, 1.3 crore registered deeds, 1.69 lakh RERA projects across 1,233 cities and townsSource
Sources tracked: 332 land record sources tracked on the coverage pageSource
Records are loaded state by state and the coverage page tracks 332 sources, but no refresh cadence is stated.
Not published
As of
Nov 2026
Nov 2026
"Not published" means the provider does not state this on a public page. It is not a judgement on the product.
Which one should you choose?
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
Choose IndiaPropertyRegister if
you want plot, owner, village and government rate data through one API instead of state-by-state portals
you want a flat ₹0.40 per successful call, with errors free, and ₹50 free credit before you pay
you want AI agents to query land records through a 29 tool MCP server with OAuth sign-in and an emailed code
you want RERA projects, bank and tribunal auctions, registered deeds and circle rates alongside plot records
you want a published coverage page that shows which state sources are loaded and how deep each one goes
Skip it if you need a certified copy, a title opinion or uniform plot level depth in every state: IndiaPropertyRegister states that plot depth varies by state and that its records are not proof of title.
Choose PropContext if
you focus on Bangalore and want RERA-verified project details by registration number, including builder and possession date
you want an MCP connector rather than a REST integration
you want to evaluate PropContext through its demo or sales conversation before deciding
Skip it if you need a public API, published prices or self-serve sign-up: these were not found for PropContext in this review.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for land and property data, IndiaPropertyRegister or PropContext?
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger choice for developers, ops teams and AI agents that need land and property data by API: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up. PropContext is the better fit for RERA-verified Bangalore project details via MCP. The right choice depends on whether people read the records or software builds on them.
Does PropContext have an API or an MCP server?
PropContext has no API documentation in this review. PropContext lists a public MCP server. IndiaPropertyRegister offers a REST API at indiapropertyregister.com/api/v1 with an OpenAPI spec and an MCP server at indiapropertyregister.com/mcp with 29 tools and OAuth 2.1 sign-in, and one prepaid wallet pays for both.
How much does PropContext cost compared with IndiaPropertyRegister?
PropContext does not publish a full price list in this review. IndiaPropertyRegister charges INR 0.40 per successful call, with errors and not-found calls free, INR 50 free credit and no subscription. Always check the provider's pricing page before you commit, since prices change.
Can an AI agent use PropContext or IndiaPropertyRegister?
Yes, an AI agent can use IndiaPropertyRegister: it runs a 29 tool MCP server covering places, plots, owners, rates, auctions and RERA projects. PropContext also lists a public MCP server, so either one can serve an agent. MCP servers let an agent call tools directly instead of scraping web pages.
When should you choose PropContext instead of IndiaPropertyRegister?
Choose PropContext when you focus on Bangalore and want RERA-verified project details by registration number, including builder and possession date. It is also a good fit when you want an MCP connector rather than a REST integration. Choose IndiaPropertyRegister less readily when you need a certified copy, a title opinion or uniform plot level depth in every state: IndiaPropertyRegister states that plot depth varies by state and that its records are not proof of title.
What data does IndiaPropertyRegister cover compared with PropContext?
IndiaPropertyRegister covers about 20 crore plots, 5.1 crore municipal properties, 1.3 crore registered deeds and 1.69 lakh RERA projects across 36 states and UTs, with plot depth varying by state. As published, PropContext covers: Bangalore. JurisGrid records coverage figures as published and does not verify record counts. Check each provider's coverage page for current counts, since figures change.
Also compared
Other land and property records comparisons on JurisGrid.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.
IndiaPropertyRegister is the stronger pick for developers, ops teams and AI agents: it has a public API, an MCP server, public per-call prices and self-serve sign-up.